1) According to the theory of well-being, there is only a reasonable consideration if a promise is made in the benefit of the promise or at the expense of the promise that prompts the promise of something else for the beneficiary of the promise. For example, promises that are not pure gifts are not considered enforceable, as the personal satisfaction that the donor can obtain from the promise by the act of generosity is generally not considered a sufficient inconvenience to obtain adequate consideration. 2) Under the idea of a good deal for exchange, there is appropriate thinking when a promisor makes a promise in exchange for something else. Here is the essential condition that the promisor was given something specifically to induce the promise made. In other words, the theory of good deal for exchange differs from the theory of damage-benefit by the fact that the centre of gravity of the theory of the exchange of parties seems to be the reason for making the promises and subjective mutual consent of the parties, while the emphasis on damage-benefit theory seems to be an objective legal disadvantage or an advantage for the parties. In the United States, an unusual type of unworkable contract is a personal employment contract to work as a spy or secret agent. Indeed, the secret of the contract is a condition of the contract (to maintain plausible denial). If the spy then sues the government for issues such as salary or benefits, the spy violated the contract by revealing its existence. It is therefore unenforceable for this reason, as is the public policy of maintaining national security (because an angry officer might try to reveal all the secrets of the government during his complaint).  Other types of non-opposable employment contracts include contracts that agree to work for less than the minimum wage and lose the right to workers` compensation in cases where compensation is due.
Categorised in: Uncategorized
This post was written by